Tools - Risk Analysis using PICTA
08:56
Posted by jason tratch
Risk analysis focuses
on attaining the details related to the risk events. One method is to focus on the process of
determining probability and impact of the risk. This information forms the basis of how risks are analyzed, prioritized, ranked and
ultimately responded to.
The two main parameters to always know are PI (probability and impact). However, additional ones also include: Cause, Timing, Frequency and Alternatives.
See video below for an explanation on what the tool/acronym PICTA stands for:
Try to remember the word PICTA - Probability, Impact, Cause, Timing/frequency, Alternatives.
Keep that in your back pocket at all times to help focus on key parameters of risk analysis.
Keep that in your back pocket at all times to help focus on key parameters of risk analysis.
Supporting details related to the two key parameters are included below:
Qualitative risk analysis should follow a
systematic approach to identify:
- Probability – the likelihood that the risk event will occur. The probability should be assigned a numeric value. The definition or scale must be detailed enough that there is no misunderstanding by stakeholders. The scale may range from 0 (will not occur) to 0.5 (in the middle, may or may not occur and has an equal change for each) to 1 (certainty that it will occur). It may also help to draw a scale (people can then visualize it).
- Impact – this reflects the magnitude of the consequence how the project will be affected if the risk event occurs. This must be assessed by the team with a focus on the project as a whole (generally the objectives should be reviewed and compared to the types of consequences that could occur). More detailed impact analysis could be done later in the risk planning stages with a focus on a more specific area (e.g. scope, time, cost, quality, training, etc) but this should follow a more customized risk management approach with specific resources assigned. Similar to the probability scale, the impact scale definition must be detailed enough that there is no misunderstanding by stakeholders. Generally the scale will have a column that assigns the impact a numeric value and also a column with a definition.
An example includes:
Impact Value
|
Impact Level
|
Definition
|
1
|
Low
|
Impact will be minor and not noticeable outside
the project team
|
3
|
Medium
|
Impact will influence the plans of the project,
corrective actions will be taken, active response planning will be required
|
5
|
High
|
Impact is major and stakeholders outside the
project team will need to be immediately involved
|
For additional details on a risk matrix approach using PI, see a journal paper at the link below:
scientificpapers-risk-analysis
This entry was posted on October 4, 2009 at 12:14 pm, and is filed under
Share,
Tools,
Video
. Follow any responses to this post through RSS. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Post a Comment